Comments on: The Seething Unconscious http://www.elhazablaze.com/2008/06/the-seething-unconscious/ Elhaz Ablaze: Chaos Heathenism on the Web Fri, 23 Nov 2012 09:33:13 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1 hourly 1 By: Henry http://www.elhazablaze.com/2008/06/the-seething-unconscious/comment-page-1/#comment-823 Henry Thu, 24 Jun 2010 11:28:11 +0000 http://www.ironwoodsound.com.au/elhaz/?p=298#comment-823 Interesting. Personally I am quite partial to Edred's model - I might have to read up on it again. I guess the thing is that there are so many possible models that could be constructed (the Yahoo Seidh Study elist is a great hotbed for such debates and discussions at times)...Edred's is a well-rounded model, but even so is one of potentially many legitimate models... Interesting. Personally I am quite partial to Edred’s model – I might have to read up on it again. I guess the thing is that there are so many possible models that could be constructed (the Yahoo Seidh Study elist is a great hotbed for such debates and discussions at times)…Edred’s is a well-rounded model, but even so is one of potentially many legitimate models…

]]> By: Chris Travers http://www.elhazablaze.com/2008/06/the-seething-unconscious/comment-page-1/#comment-820 Chris Travers Wed, 23 Jun 2010 23:21:21 +0000 http://www.ironwoodsound.com.au/elhaz/?p=298#comment-820 It's worth noting that the Runic Psychology model in Runelore was actually drawn from a paper by Stephen Flowers published in the Journal of Indo-European Studies. While I remain undecided on some aspects of the model, it's worth noting that Edgar Polome praised the article in one of his essays in "Essays on Germanic Religion" (from the JIES monograph series). Polome called the analysis "careful" which suggests that it did meet academic standards. I have been trying to get my hands on the original article but have thus far been unsuccessful so all I have is Polome's reference to it. That doesn't mean no disagreement is possible. However it does suggest that it should be considered to have some basis in serious study. It’s worth noting that the Runic Psychology model in Runelore was actually drawn from a paper by Stephen Flowers published in the Journal of Indo-European Studies. While I remain undecided on some aspects of the model, it’s worth noting that Edgar Polome praised the article in one of his essays in “Essays on Germanic Religion” (from the JIES monograph series). Polome called the analysis “careful” which suggests that it did meet academic standards. I have been trying to get my hands on the original article but have thus far been unsuccessful so all I have is Polome’s reference to it.

That doesn’t mean no disagreement is possible. However it does suggest that it should be considered to have some basis in serious study.

]]>