Nothing is True, Everything is Permitted: this little truism of chaos magic has been doing the rounds for years.
It is usually attributed to chaos magician/culture jammer Hakim Bey. People think that because Bey has an exotic Middle Eastern name the slogan must stem from some kind of ancient oriental magical tradition.
Hakim Bey is of course a pen name for an American gentleman whose “real” name escapes me but who is definitely not Middle Eastern. And no disrespect to Bey, who seems to be a pretty cool dude, but if “Joe Bloggs” were the parent of the NiTEiP slogan I suspect it would not have been nearly as popular.
Chinese whispers is an hilarious thing, and people get confused about the root origin of NiTEiP. After all, I’ve never met anyone whose actually read the book in which Bey unleashed NiTEiP on the world (I don’t even know what book it was)!
Case in point about the magic of hearsay. The Isis album In the Absence of Truth is subtitled with “NiTEiP” and the liner notes attribute it to Hasaan I Sabaah, the Old Man of the Mountain and apocryphal master of assassins in their original (almost certainly mythical) hash smoking incarnation.
Isis do generously acknowledge that this attribution is contentious among historians. In fact historians probably do not even know about this attribution, since it is purely the domain of confused occultnik meme scavenging.
I can’t help but think of a bunch of stoners sitting around giggling at the weed-induced hilarity of NiTEiP. Then someone asks where it comes from. Bloodshot eyes and clouded minds do their best, and somehow Hakim Bey is recalled but in totally the wrong context. Next thing you know a very intelligent and classy band has been sucked into yet another branch of NiTEiP attribution mythology.
None of this is to say that Isis are a bad lot; I’ve written before about how much adoration I have for them. But even these brilliant stalwarts have made a NiTEiP gaff, and a pretty big one at that.
Of course, there’s some kind of strange irony (perhaps not quite irony, perhaps coppery or zincy) to the idea of complaining about people misattributing the statement that “Nothing is True, Everything is Permitted.” I mean, if we agree with the statement (a BIG “if” there), then who cares who coined it?
Well you know NiTEiP might be subversive and antinomian and mind blowing and chaos magical. Or it might be rank laziness. I wouldn’t dream of throwing the first stone of course, living as I continue to do in a glass house.
But I think there’s a certain shallowness that crowds around magical communities. You see it in the haphazard adoption of philosophies and ideas that occultists tend to get mired in. How many Jung-obsessed new agers have actually read Jung?
(Similarly [though not identically] Steven McNallen’s reading of Jung as presented in his notion of metagenetics doesn’t seem to bear much resemblance to the great Swiss alchemist. It’s quite breathtaking to see such an inveterately universalist thinker marshalled to support such an anti-universalist point of view).
While it is all very well to be trumpeting the wondrous brilliance of Personal Gnosis Above All (PGAA), I find that the more I research actual magical traditions the more I realise that the average modern occultist or Heathen has far inferior ideas to those that mythological or occult traditions have left behind. We really need tradition as a source of material for our creative, spiritual, and unconscious aspects to weave into reality.
The depth and texture of a whole magical ideology cannot possibly be replicated in the half hearted attempts of individual seekers of whatever sort to invent their own. How can one person compete with centuries of people organically and indirectly collaborating across the ages?
Flip side is of course that strict adherence to the forms of tradition leads utterly nowhere, just arm chair theorising and the temptation to spout opinions as though they were true knowledge. I’m sorry folks but Socrates made the point some 2,500 years ago that people who are quick to spout on about their great wisdom…tend to be the most ignorant of the lot.
But rebounding from that digression, my point is that my personal mythology gets richer and richer through my periodic immersion in traditional imagery, writings, reflections. And I am drawn into these inexorably, too.
For example in the last few months I have been having many spontaneous and symbolic experiences that could only be described as alchemical (this happened before, throughout most of 2008). So I experience these images and connections and then I find myself reading some book or website and – AHA! – discover exactly what I’m experiencing, the precise same images, etc, recorded in some century old manuscript…only with a depth and subtlety that I as one person cannot possible equal.
And these points of reference in alchemical tradition then push me deeper into my personal gnosis, which begins to flower in fractal and unpredictable ways…and my ego is the last know what is going on and that suits my spirit just fine, because I know (don’t ask how) that I am evolving more and more into myself. Ecce homo!
I suppose in a sense as a Chaos Heathen I am a shameless syncretist, but with the difference that unlike the NiTEiP crowd I do not disrespect tradition simply because I see the limitations of adhering strictly to it. Rather I immerse myself in many traditions, secure in the base of my Heathenry as the taproot of my spirit, and allow the essential to merge with me and the inessential to wash away like fresh rain.
Such comments probably seem just as heretical to the “strict boundaries” brigade as they do the “NiTEiP” crew. Well good, I can stick it to both of you with one manoeuvre. Score: Chaos Heathens 1, Ideological Blowhards 0, Spiritual Wastrels 0.
I’m going to tell you a little secret, though, about the true origin of NiTEiP, which is actually, as it happens, a misquote (I assume Mr Bey decided to tweak it a bit to throw off annoying conceptual bloodhounds like myself, not that this trickery worked on me).
In Thus Spoke Zarathustra Friedrich Nietzsche (repeatedly, I think) has Zarathustra declare that “Nothing is true, ALL is permitted.” I’m not sure how that renders in the original German (maybe Matt Anon can help us there) but the point is made: Nietzsche was dead before Bey was born. He wins hands down in the “who said it first” race.
Naturally, most members of the NiTEiP brigade have only read the occasional quote of Nietzsche…and hence have zero chance of noticing this little factoid. Whereas not only have I read a lot of his books, but repeatedly and because I enjoy it. Gods, what a bloody nerd.
Incidentally, next time some idiot chaos magician shuffles out the “Hakim Bey says that…” line in an attempt to impress you, feel free to put them in their place with a bit of solid Nietzsche whacking. Bonus points for derailing their attempt to seduce some impressionable younger witchypoo with their stock of pseudo-spiritual platitudes.
Nietzsche of course wanted to re-examine tradition, to smash what did not work and develop the rest into something original and shining. For him “Nothing is true, all is permitted” is one of his tests of exhilaration and horror as one faces into the infinite mystery of the universe. Not unlike his “God is dead” trip, a trip which is way more subtle and complex than your typical dumb ass metal head will ever appreciate (I can say that because I listen to and sometimes even perform metal).
Nietzsche also at times claimed to be a perspectivalist, not accepting the notion of absolute truth (though he at other times seems convinced of a whole bunch of absolutes, which just goes to demonstrate how marvellous it is to be a confused human being as we all are).
Maybe he wouldn’t have minded that Bey seems to have – no doubt with excellent intentions – ripped him off. The lame use to which the NiTEiP slogan gets set to would likely fail to bring Nietzsche any cheer of course.
The point of these musings? There is a lot more bullshit out there than gold, although luckily through alchemy we can turn one into the other. If NiTEiP makes you a better person (how we establish criteria for defining what “better” means is another problem) then who cares that it is a load of rubbish; indeed, it has to be a load of rubbish into order to fit within the kind of universe it invokes.
So what is my point? Here is the punch line:
What matters is not what you believe, but how you believe, and whether you use your ability to believe as a constructive tool to transcend the limits of your horribly finite human perspective…rather than allow it to be the jailer of your consciousness as to greater or lesser extents we all do.
Well, that’s my opinion…blink and you’ll miss me changing my mind though…



The Mystery Method
















